Re: monitoring usage count distribution

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com
Subject: Re: monitoring usage count distribution
Date: 2023-04-05 19:35:05
Message-ID: 20230405193505.GA105962@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 03:07:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Seems to me that six rows would be easier to aggregate manually.
> An array column seems less SQL-ish and harder to manipulate.

+1

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-04-05 19:41:01 Re: monitoring usage count distribution
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2023-04-05 19:25:52 Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode