Re: monitoring usage count distribution

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com
Subject: Re: monitoring usage count distribution
Date: 2023-04-04 23:25:27
Message-ID: 20230404232527.iy7do2hgopr7ri4x@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-04-04 14:14:36 -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Tom expressed skepticism that there's wide interest here. It seems as
> much from the lack of response. But perhaps that's just because people
> don't understand what the importance of this info is -- I certainly
> don't :)

pg_buffercache has exposed the raw data for a long time. The problem is that
it's way too slow to look at that way.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-04-04 23:29:19 Re: monitoring usage count distribution
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-04-04 23:23:38 Re: fill_seq_fork_with_data() initializes buffer without lock