Re: Refactor calculations to use instr_time

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Refactor calculations to use instr_time
Date: 2023-03-30 21:25:24
Message-ID: 20230330212524.yz2chdxl6iyugbme@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I pushed this version! Thanks all, for the contribution and reviews.

> > I would either put WalUsage into PgStat_PendingWalStats (so that it has
> > all the same members as PgStat_WalStats), or figure out a way to
> > maintain WalUsage separately from PgStat_WalStats or something else.
> > Worst case, add more comments to the struct definitions to explain why
> > they have the members they have and how WalUsage relates to them.
>
> Yes, but like Andres said this could be better done as a separate patch.

I invite you to write a patch for that for 17...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-03-30 21:33:48 Re: Thoughts on using Text::Template for our autogenerated code?
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2023-03-30 21:15:29 Re: ICU locale validation / canonicalization