Re: On login trigger: take three

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mikhail Gribkov <youzhick(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ted Yu <yuzhihong(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Sergey Shinderuk <s(dot)shinderuk(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Ivan Panchenko <wao(at)mail(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: On login trigger: take three
Date: 2023-03-06 22:10:10
Message-ID: 20230306221010.gszjoakt5jp7oqpd@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-03-06 15:55:01 -0500, Gregory Stark (as CFM) wrote:
> It looks like Daniel Gustafsson, Andres, and Tom have all weighed in
> on this patch with at least a neutral comment (+-0 from Andres :)
>
> It looks like the main concern was breaking physical replicas and that
> there was consensus that as long as single-user mode worked that it
> was ok?

I don't think it's OK with just single user mode as an scape hatch. We need
the GUC that was discussed as part of the thread (and I think there's a patch
for that too).

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-03-06 22:18:18 Re: On login trigger: take three
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2023-03-06 22:09:58 Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM