Re: Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState
Date: 2023-03-03 00:19:24
Message-ID: 20230303001924.tv7m2jlmb3oro4ab@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-03-02 13:00:31 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'm not opposed to EXPR_PARAM_SET, to be clear. I'll send an updated
> version later. I was just thinking about the correctness in the current
> world.

Attached.

I named the set EEOP_PARAM_SET EEOP_PARAM_EXEC_SET or such, because I
was wondering if there cases it could also be useful in conjunction with
PARAM_EXTERN, and because nothing really depends on the kind of param.

Greetings,

Andres

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-WIP-Evaluate-arguments-of-correlated-SubPlans-in-.patch text/x-diff 12.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-03-03 00:29:07 Re: Add the ability to limit the amount of memory that can be allocated to backends.
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-03-03 00:18:04 Re: Rework LogicalOutputPluginWriterUpdateProgress