Re: Provide PID data for "cannot wait on a latch owned by another process" in latch.c

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Provide PID data for "cannot wait on a latch owned by another process" in latch.c
Date: 2023-02-27 08:54:06
Message-ID: 20230227.175406.1010490272505798449.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Uggg^2

At Mon, 27 Feb 2023 17:53:08 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> > Please tidy up the followging sentence properly and natural but in a moderately formal way, within the context of computer programs, and provide explanations for the individual changes you made.
>
> Please ignore the following sentense. It is an extra sentence

s/following/above/;

> mistakenly copy-pasted in.
>
> > +1 for adding that information, I'm afraid that MyProcId is not
> > necessary since it is displayed in log lines in most cases. If you
> > want to display the both PIDs I suggest making them more distinctive.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-02-27 09:01:37 Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-02-27 08:53:08 Re: Provide PID data for "cannot wait on a latch owned by another process" in latch.c