New "blob" re-introduced?

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: New "blob" re-introduced?
Date: 2023-02-24 07:31:27
Message-ID: 20230224.163127.68506240520261483.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I noticed that the commit e9960732a9 introduced the following message.

+ if (EndCompressFileHandle(ctx->dataFH) != 0)
+ pg_fatal("could not close blob data file: %m");

It seems that we have removed the terminology "blob(s)" from
user-facing messages by the commit 35ce24c333 (discussion is [1]).
Shouldn't we use "large object" instead of "blob" in the message?

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/868a381f-4650-9460-1726-1ffd39a270b4%40enterprisedb.com

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-02-24 07:38:44 Re: New "blob" re-introduced?
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2023-02-24 07:11:38 Re: Proposal: :SQL_EXEC_TIME (like :ROW_COUNT) Variable (psql)