| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: verbose mode for pg_input_error_message? |
| Date: | 2023-02-23 18:40:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20230223184048.GA470211@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 03:41:12PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> My vote would be to redefine the existing pg_input_error_message() function
> to return a record, but I recognize that this would inflate the patch quite
> a bit due to all the existing uses in the tests. If this is the only
> argument against this approach, I'm happy to help with the patch.
Here's an attempt at this.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-add-details-to-pg_input_error_message.patch | text/x-diff | 82.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2023-02-23 18:45:13 | Re: Proposal: %T Prompt parameter for psql for current time (like Oracle has) |
| Previous Message | Corey Huinker | 2023-02-23 18:39:14 | Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size |