Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
Date: 2023-02-21 05:49:48
Message-ID: 20230221054948.GA2717@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:51:28AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 3:36 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Overall, I think this patch is in reasonable shape.
> Thanks for reviewing. Please see the attached v5 patch.

I'm marking this as ready-for-committer. I think a couple of the comments
could use some small adjustments, but that probably doesn't need to hold up
this patch.

Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services:

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-02-21 06:13:10 Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy
Previous Message Amit Langote 2023-02-21 05:40:09 Re: SQL/JSON revisited