Re: Progress report of CREATE INDEX for nested partitioned tables

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ilya Gladyshev <ilya(dot)v(dot)gladyshev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Progress report of CREATE INDEX for nested partitioned tables
Date: 2023-02-17 00:26:51
Message-ID: 20230217002651.GW1653@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 04:40:49PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> This squishes together 001/2 as the main patch.
> I believe it's ready.

Update to address a compiler warning in the supplementary patches adding
assertions.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-fix-CREATE-INDEX-progress-report-with-nested-partiti.patch text/x-diff 8.2 KB
0002-assertions-for-progress-reporting.patch text/x-diff 4.0 KB
0003-f-also-assert-that-progress-values-don-t-go-backward.patch text/x-diff 8.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-17 00:32:04 Re: Reducing System Allocator Thrashing of ExecutorState to Alleviate FDW-related Performance Degradations
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-02-17 00:23:51 Re: Introduce list_reverse() to make lcons() usage less inefficient