| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, xinwen(at)stu(dot)scu(dot)edu(dot)cn, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c |
| Date: | 2023-02-13 19:45:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20230213194517.e2f4xsxzpdmcyg7b@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On 2023-02-13 16:21:11 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 13:46, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > What about find_compatible_agg()? I don't think there's as severe
> > consequences, but it also doesn't seem right as-is.
>
> This does not seem related to the issue being reported here. It seems
> to me this would only affect the aggregate deduplication logic and
> nothing else.
Fair enough.
I guess I was influenced by my thinking that we ought to combine more of the
relevant logic between "plain" aggregates and window functions.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2023-02-14 03:25:04 | BUG #17791: Assert on procarray.c |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-02-13 19:41:31 | Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it. |