Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com, vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com, pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com, lukas(at)fittl(dot)com, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date: 2023-02-11 18:24:37
Message-ID: 20230211182437.ype5tk3awen2htvw@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-02-08 21:03:19 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Pushed the first (and biggest) commit. More tomorrow.

Just pushed the actual pg_stat_io view, the splitting of the tablespace test,
and the pg_stat_io tests.

Yay!

Thanks all for patch and review!

> Already can't wait to see incremental improvements of this version of
> pg_stat_io ;). Tracking buffer hits. Tracking Wal IO. Tracking relation IO
> bypassing shared buffers. Per connection IO statistics. Tracking IO time.

That's still the case.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-11 19:24:20 Improving inferred query column names
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-02-11 15:50:39 Re: UUID v7