| From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com, osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com, shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com, shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com, dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com, euler(at)eulerto(dot)com, m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions) |
| Date: | 2023-02-10 00:49:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20230210.094913.1383302091608326338.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Thu, 9 Feb 2023 13:26:19 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
amit.kapila16> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 12:17 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I understand in theory, your code is more efficient, but in practice,
> > I think the overhead of a single variable assignment every loop
> > iteration (which is doing WaitLatch anyway) is of insignificant
> > concern, whereas having one assignment is simpler than having two IMO.
> >
>
> Yeah, that sounds better to me as well.
FWIW, I'm on board with this.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-02-10 00:57:22 | Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-02-10 00:46:04 | Re: Introduce a new view for checkpointer related stats |