Re: recovery modules

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: recovery modules
Date: 2023-02-08 17:33:44
Message-ID: 20230208173344.ku22sogm6jgr27cl@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-02-08 09:27:05 -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 08:27:13AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > One minor thing: I don't think we really need the AssertVariableIsOfType() for
> > anything but the Init() one?
>
> This is another part that was borrowed from logical decoding output
> plugins.

I know :(. It was needed in an earlier version of the output plugin interface,
where all the different callbacks were looked up via dlsym(), but should have
been removed after that.

> I'm not sure this adds much since f2b73c8 ("Add central
> declarations for dlsym()ed symbols"). Perhaps we should remove all of
> these assertions for functions that now have central declarations.

Most of them weren't needed even before that.

And yes, I'd be for a patch to remove all of those assertions.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-02-08 17:34:59 Re: [PATCH] Make ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING and ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE consistent
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-02-08 17:27:05 Re: recovery modules