Re: recovery modules

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: recovery modules
Date: 2023-02-08 16:27:13
Message-ID: 20230208162713.zavyhxywheh4kuns@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-02-08 16:23:34 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 10:14:36AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 11:59:20AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> + ArchiveModuleCallbacks struct filled with the callback function pointers for
> >> This needs a structname markup.
> >>
> >> + can use <literal>state->private_data</literal> to store it.
> >> And here it would be structfield.
> >
> > fixed
>
> Andres, did you have the change to look at that? I did look at it,
> but it may not address all the points you may have in mind.

Yes, I think this looks pretty good now.

One minor thing: I don't think we really need the AssertVariableIsOfType() for
anything but the Init() one?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-02-08 16:58:59 Re: Named Operators
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-02-08 16:23:10 Re: meson: Non-feature feature options