Re: recovery modules

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: recovery modules
Date: 2023-01-30 20:04:22
Message-ID: 20230130200422.GA2797238@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:48:10AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't think _PG_archive_module_init() should actually allocate a memory
> context and do other similar initializations. Instead it should just return
> 'const ArchiveModuleCallbacks*', typically a single line.
> Allocations etc should happen in one of the callbacks. That way we can
> actually have multiple instances of a module.

I think we'd need to invent a startup callback for archive modules for this
to work, but that's easy enough.

Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services:

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-01-30 20:06:46 Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-01-30 20:00:55 Re: postgres_fdw uninterruptible during connection establishment / ProcSignalBarrier