Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 (typo)

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Sergey Shinderuk <s(dot)shinderuk(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com, joel(at)compiler(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 (typo)
Date: 2023-01-20 20:33:44
Message-ID: 20230120203344.zdt3mumffrwy6hva@erthalion.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've accumulated another collection of various questions and comments. As a
side note I'm getting a good feeling about this patch, those part I've read so
far looks good to me.

* I've suddenly realized one could use pseudo types for variables, and
it not always works. E.g.:

=# create variable pseudo_array anyarray;
=# select pseudo_array;
pseudo_array
--------------
NULL

=# let pseudo_array = ARRAY[1, 2, 3];
ERROR: 42804: target session variable is of type anyarray but expression is of type integer[]
LOCATION: svariableStartupReceiver, svariableReceiver.c:79

=# create variable pseudo_unknown unknown;
=# select pseudo_unknown;
ERROR: XX000: failed to find conversion function from unknown to text
LOCATION: coerce_type, parse_coerce.c:542

Is it supposed to be like this, or something is missing?

* I think it was already mentioned in the thread, there seems to be not a
single usage of CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in session_variable.c . But some number
of loops over the sessionvars are implemented, are they always going to be
small enough to not make any troubles?

* sync_sessionvars_all explains why is it necessary to copy xact_recheck_varids:

When we check the variables, the system cache can be invalidated,
and xact_recheck_varids can be enhanced.

I'm not quite following what the "enhancement" part is about? Is
xact_recheck_varids could be somehow updated concurrently with the loop?

* A small typo

diff --git a/src/backend/commands/session_variable.c b/src/backend/commands/session_variable.c
--- a/src/backend/commands/session_variable.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/session_variable.c
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ sync_sessionvars_all(bool filter_lxid)

/*
* When we check the variables, the system cache can be invalidated,
- * and xac_recheck_varids can be enhanced. We want to iterate
+ * and xact_recheck_varids can be enhanced. We want to iterate

NOTE: The commentaries above were made based on the previous patch version, but
it looks like those aspects were not changed.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-01-20 20:42:03 Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet
Previous Message Karl O. Pinc 2023-01-20 20:22:25 Re: Doc: Rework contrib appendix -- informative titles, tweaked sentences