|From:||Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|To:||Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:17:35PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:54 PM Nathan Bossart
> <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > OK. Might be worth a short comment.
>> I added one.
> Thanks. I'd move it to the inner indentation level so it's closer to
> the test at issue.
I meant for it to cover the call to HaveNFreeProcs() as well since the same
idea applies. I left it the same for now, but if you still think it makes
sense to move it, I'll do so.
> I would also suggest reordering the documentation and the
> postgresql.conf.sample file so that reserved_connections precedes
> superuser_reserved_connections, instead of following it.
> Other than that, this seems like it might be about ready to commit,
> barring objections or bug reports.
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
|Next Message||Robert Haas||2023-01-19 20:12:12||Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2023-01-19 19:39:26||Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning|