From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode |
Date: | 2023-01-11 18:58:54 |
Message-ID: | 20230111185854.5srlvequbxbg5p6c@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-01-11 10:35:19 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:27 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Therefore I'd like to add an option to the VACUUM command to use to disable
> > the use of the ringbuffer. Not sure about the name yet.
>
> Sounds like a good idea.
Any idea about the name? The obvious thing is to reference ring buffers in the
option name, but that's more of an implementation detail...
Some ideas:
USE_RING_BUFFERS on|off
SCAN_PROTECTION on|off
REUSE_BUFFERS on|off
LIMIT_BUFFER_USAGE on|off
Regards,
Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-01-11 19:06:26 | Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-01-11 18:54:45 | Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode |