Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames

From: Sandro Santilli <strk(at)kbt(dot)io>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Regina Obe <r(at)pcorp(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Date: 2023-01-10 20:52:59
Message-ID: 20230110205259.htcuhg3t7shd367d@c19
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 05:51:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> Have you considered the idea of instead inventing a "\include" facility

[...]

> cases, you still need one script file for each supported upgrade step

That's exactly the problem we're trying to solve here.
The include support is nice on itself, but won't solve our problem.

--strk;

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2023-01-10 21:07:32 Re: [PATCH] Add `verify-system` sslmode to use system CA pool for server cert
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-01-10 20:41:53 Re: Fixing a couple of buglets in how VACUUM sets visibility map bits