Re: Avoiding "wrong tuple length" errors at the end of VACUUM on pg_database update (Backpatch of 947789f to v12 and v13)

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Avoiding "wrong tuple length" errors at the end of VACUUM on pg_database update (Backpatch of 947789f to v12 and v13)
Date: 2023-01-10 17:54:31
Message-ID: 20230110175431.GA1340007@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:57:43AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> Any objections about getting 947789f applied to REL_13_STABLE and
>> REL_12_STABLE and see this issue completely gone from all the versions
>> supported?
>
> No objections to back-patching the fix...

+1

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-01-10 18:11:35 Re: can while loop in ClockSweepTick function be kind of infinite loop in some cases?
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2023-01-10 17:54:28 Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup