Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>
Subject: Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local
Date: 2023-01-03 01:21:53
Message-ID: 20230103012153.kjcziwfdzuunfwvb@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-01-02 15:46:36 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-12-29 13:40:13 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > > Should we backpatch this? Given the volume of warnings it's probably a good
> > > > idea. But I'd let it step in HEAD for a few days of buildfarm coverage first.
> > >
> > > +1 to both points.
> >
> > Pushed to HEAD.
>
> I haven't seen any problems in HEAD, so I'm working on backpatching.

And done.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-01-03 02:17:31 Re: Simplify standby state machine a bit in WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable()
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2023-01-03 01:15:54 Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)