| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions |
| Date: | 2022-12-07 11:44:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20221207114415.hqtlmey4ffv24hvs@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Dec-07, Amit Langote wrote:
> While doing that, I noticed that I had missed updating at least one
> comment which still says that permission checking is done off of the
> range table. Attached patch fixes that.
Pushed, thanks.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-12-07 11:51:15 | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
| Previous Message | Yuya Watari | 2022-12-07 11:30:24 | Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions |