Re: meson PGXS compatibility

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: meson PGXS compatibility
Date: 2022-12-07 03:05:53
Message-ID: 20221207030553.oftasv4yzkvn5hyf@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-12-01 12:17:51 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'll push 0001, 0002 shortly. I don't think 0002 is the most elegant approach,
> but it's not awful. I'd still like some review for 0003, but will try to push
> it in a few days if that's not forthcoming.

Pushed 0003 (move export_dynamic determination to configure.ac) and 0004 (PGXS
compatibility). Hope there's no fallout from 0003.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-12-07 03:16:18 Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster
Previous Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2022-12-07 03:01:35 RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply