Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster
Date: 2022-12-07 01:08:43
Message-ID: 20221207010843.GF8135@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> From 61480441f67ca7fac96ca4bcfe85f27013a47aa8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:13:36 +1300
> Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] Don't leak a signalfd when using latches in the
> postmaster.
>
> + /*
> + * It would probably be safe to re-use the inherited signalfd since
> + * signalfds only see the current processes pending signals, but it

I think you mean "current process's", right ?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-12-07 01:12:37 Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-12-07 00:57:22 Re: Query Jumbling for CALL and SET utility statements