Re: Failed Assert in pgstat_assoc_relation

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Failed Assert in pgstat_assoc_relation
Date: 2022-12-02 16:42:38
Message-ID: 20221202164238.t73us2bxgohc7bvi@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-12-02 01:03:35 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On December 1, 2022 9:48:48 PM PST, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> I'd suggest putting in an assertion that the relkind isn't changing,
> >> instead.
>
> > Sounds like a plan. Will you do that when you remove the table-to-view hack?
>
> I'd suggest committing it concurrently with the v15 fix, instead,
> so that there's a cross-reference to what some future hacker might
> need to install if they remove the assertion.

Good idea.

> I guess that means that the table-to-view removal has to go in
> first. I should be able to take care of that tomorrow, or if
> you're in a hurry I don't mind if you commit it for me.

No particular hurry from my end.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-12-02 16:57:17 Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-12-02 16:41:31 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum