Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
Date: 2022-11-19 18:41:30
Message-ID: 20221119184130.GN11463@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 04:19:15PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 1:50 PM Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> > In grant.sgml,
> >
> > 'actualy permisions'
> >
> > looks a bit unorthodox.
>
> Fixed that, and the other mistake Álvaro spotted, and also bumped
> catversion because I forgot that earlier.

I think Erik was trying to report that both words were misspelled. I
added to my typos to be fixed in batch if you want to wait.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2022-11-19 18:50:04 Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-11-19 17:02:32 Re: [BUG] pg_dump blocked