Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames

From: Sandro Santilli <strk(at)kbt(dot)io>
To: Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, 'Laurenz Albe' <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Date: 2022-11-09 17:53:52
Message-ID: 20221109175352.5iqtpnjz2e5nk65r@c19
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

And now a version of the patch including documentation and regression tests.
Anything you see I should improve ?


On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 06:31:58PM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:55:05AM -0400, Regina Obe wrote:
> >
> > Sandro, can you submit an updated version of this patch.
> > I was testing it out and looked good first time.
> Attached updated version of the patch.
> > If everyone is okay with this patch, we'll go ahead and add tests and
> > documentation to go with it.
> Yes please let us know if there's any chance of getting this
> mechanism approved or if we should keep advertising works around
> this limitation (it's not just installing 100s of files but also
> still missing needed upgrade paths when doing so).
> --strk;

Attachment Content-Type Size
Allow-wildcard-in-extension-upgrade-paths.patch text/x-diff 9.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2022-11-09 18:12:36 Re: refactor ownercheck and aclcheck functions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-11-09 17:38:08 Re: heavily contended lwlocks with long wait queues scale badly