Re: Fix proposal for comparaison bugs in PostgreSQL::Version

From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix proposal for comparaison bugs in PostgreSQL::Version
Date: 2022-11-04 14:06:29
Message-ID: 20221104150629.2efffb5a@karst
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 13:11:18 -0500
Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 06:17:40PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Nice catch, but this looks like massive overkill. I think we can very
> > simply fix the test in just a few lines of code, instead of a 190 line
> > fix and a 130 line TAP test.
> >
> > It was never intended to be able to compare markers like rc1 vs rc2, and
> > I don't see any need for it. If you can show me a sane use case I'll
> > have another look, but right now it seems quite unnecessary.
> >
> > Here's my proposed fix.
> >
> > diff --git a/src/test/perl/PostgreSQL/Version.pm
> > b/src/test/perl/PostgreSQL/Version.pm index 8f70491189..8d4dbbf694 100644
> > --- a/src/test/perl/PostgreSQL/Version.pm
>
> Is this still an outstanding issue ?

The issue still exists on current HEAD:

$ perl -Isrc/test/perl/ -MPostgreSQL::Version -le \
'print "bug" if PostgreSQL::Version->new("9.6") <= 9.0'
bug

Regards,

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2022-11-04 14:07:48 Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Previous Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2022-11-04 14:05:21 RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply