Re: explain_regress, explain(MACHINE), and default to explain(BUFFERS) (was: BUFFERS enabled by default in EXPLAIN (ANALYZE))

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: explain_regress, explain(MACHINE), and default to explain(BUFFERS) (was: BUFFERS enabled by default in EXPLAIN (ANALYZE))
Date: 2022-10-21 02:09:34
Message-ID: 20221021020934.GA13372@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rebased.

BTW, I think it may be that the GUC should be marked PGDLLIMPORT ?

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Add-GUC-explain_regress.patch text/x-diff 9.3 KB
0002-exercise-explain_regress.patch text/x-diff 12.8 KB
0003-Make-explain-default-to-BUFFERS-TRUE.patch text/x-diff 4.8 KB
0004-Add-explain-MACHINE-to-hide-machine-dependent-output.patch text/x-diff 37.1 KB
0005-.and-rows-removed-by-filter.patch text/x-diff 19.2 KB
0006-.and-Workers-Launched.patch text/x-diff 13.9 KB
0007-.and-parallel-rows.patch text/x-diff 2.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-10-21 02:21:58 Re: pg_recvlogical prints bogus error when interrupted
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-10-21 01:26:37 Re: shared memory stats ideas