Re: Transparent column encryption

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Transparent column encryption
Date: 2022-10-06 15:19:38
Message-ID: 20221006151938.2w3myrr6lb3iuyae@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-10-06 16:25:51 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 02.10.22 09:16, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2022-09-27 15:51:25 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Updated version with meson build system support added (for added files and
> > > new tests).
> >
> > This fails on windows: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6151847080624128
> >
> > https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6151847080624128/testrun/build/testrun/column_encryption/001_column_encryption/log/regress_log_001_column_encryption
> >
> > psql error: stderr: 'OPENSSL_Uplink(00007FFC165CBD50,08): no OPENSSL_Applink'
>
> What in the world is that about? What scant information I could find
> suggests that it has something to do with building a "release" build against
> an "debug" build of the openssl library, or vice versa. But this patch
> doesn't introduce any use of openssl that we haven't seen before.

It looks to me that one needs to compile, in some form, openssl/applink.c and
link it to the application. No idea why that'd be required now and not
earlier.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-10-06 15:37:43 Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2022-10-06 14:28:27 Re: request clarification on pg_restore documentation