On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > One other point to discuss: should we consider back-patching? I've > got mixed feelings about that myself. I don't think that cases where > this helps significantly are at all mainstream, so I'm kind of leaning > to "patch HEAD only".
+1. It can always be back-patched in the future if there are additional reports.