Re: A doubt about a newly added errdetail

At Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:19:35 +0200, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote in
> Yeah, since you're changing another word in that line, it's ok to move
> the parameter line off-string. (If you were only changing the parameter
> to %s and there was no message duplication, I would reject the patch as
> useless.)

I'm fine with that. By the way, related to the area, I found the
following error messages.

> errmsg("publication \"%s\" is defined as FOR ALL TABLES",
> NameStr(pubform->pubname)),
> errdetail("Schemas cannot be added to or dropped from FOR ALL TABLES publications.")));

It looks tome that the errmsg and errordetail are reversed. Isn't the following order common?

> errmsg("schemas cannot be added to or dropped from publication \"%s\".",
> NameStr(pubform->pubname)),
> errdetail("The publication is defined as FOR ALL TABLES.")));

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center