Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Date: 2022-09-20 10:53:02
Message-ID: 20220920105302.dyy2na6zfji4ded3@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-Sep-19, Isaac Morland wrote:

> I thought I saw some discussion about the SQL standard saying that there is
> a difference between putting NOT NULL in a column definition, and CHECK
> (column_name NOT NULL). So if we're going to take this seriously,

Was it Peter E.'s reply to this thread?

https://postgr.es/m/bac841ed-b86d-e3c2-030d-02a3db067307@enterprisedb.com

because if it wasn't there, then I would like to know what you source
is.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end." (2nd Commandment for C programmers)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-09-20 10:56:19 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-09-20 10:51:09 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints