Re: postgres_fdw hint messages

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw hint messages
Date: 2022-09-13 19:02:55
Message-ID: 20220913190255.GA2973985@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 08:32:43AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I notice that for column misspellings, the hint is phrased "Perhaps you
> meant X." whereas here we have "Did you mean X?". Let's make that uniform.

Good point. I attached a new version of the patch that uses the column
phrasing. I wasn't sure whether "reference" was the right word to use in
this context, but I used it for now for consistency with the column hints.
I think "specify" or "use" would work as well.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Adjust-assorted-hint-messages-that-list-all-valid.patch text/x-diff 16.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-09-13 21:01:33 Re: wrong shell trap
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-09-13 18:10:02 wrong shell trap