| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Sokolov Yura <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Error "initial slot snapshot too large" in create replication slot |
| Date: | 2022-09-12 21:53:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20220912215317.ji6ajsenawrojlqf@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-09-09 13:19:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I mentioned this patch to Andres in conversation, and he expressed a
> concern that there might be no guarantee that we retain enough CLOG to
> look up XIDs.
I was concerned we wouldn't keep enough subtrans, rather than clog. But I
think we're ok, because we need to have an appropriate ->xmin for exporting /
importing the snapshot.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-09-12 22:52:28 | Re: Can we avoid chdir'ing in resolve_symlinks() ? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-09-12 21:51:56 | Re: Error "initial slot snapshot too large" in create replication slot |