Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date: 2022-08-23 03:31:22
Message-ID: 20220823033122.diktvy6hqcyurbji@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-08-22 13:15:18 -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> v28 attached.

Pushed 0001, 0002. Thanks!

- Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2022-08-23 03:32:36 Re: [PATCH] Optimize json_lex_string by batching character copying
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-08-23 03:22:21 Re: Considering additional sort specialisation functions for PG16