| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | eric(dot)mutta(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Should 'sum(mvf)' read 'sum(mcv)'...? | 
| Date: | 2022-08-22 07:48:37 | 
| Message-ID: | 20220822074837.dy4i5t7n5xmbhjbw@jrouhaud | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs | 
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 11:02:04PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> 
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/row-estimation-examples.html
> Description:
> 
> About halfway down this page
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/row-estimation-examples.html we see
> the following formula for calculating selectivity:
> 
>     > selectivity = (1 - sum(mvf))/(num_distinct - num_mcv)
> 
> And just below the formula we see the explanatory sentence saying:
> 
>    > That is, add up all the frequencies for the MCVs and subtract them from
> one, ...
> 
> It appears the above sentence is referring to the "(1 - sum(mvf))" portion
> of the formula, however I am not sure what "mvf" is referring to
> there...shouldn't it be "(1 - sum(mcv))" in order to match what the
> explanatory sentence is saying?
It should be mcf, ie. Most Common Frequencies.  It looks like a very old typo
that survived until now.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2022-08-22 09:13:38 | Re: Should 'sum(mvf)' read 'sum(mcv)'...? | 
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2022-08-21 23:02:04 | Should 'sum(mvf)' read 'sum(mcv)'...? |