Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
Date: 2022-08-07 06:54:42
Message-ID: 20220807065442.hsctjkyrf6btis6l@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-08-06 23:20:26 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> The good: That is just because we haven't applied enough, or the right,
> magic. To have mingw to not interfere with things one also has to pass
> -D_UCRT and -lucrt - then the tests pass, even without HAVE_BUGGY_STRTOF.

Looks like only -lucrt is required, not -D_UCRT.

Asked on the mingw irc channel - it's not expected that such magic is
required. Opened https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/issues/12472

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-08-07 07:41:08 Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-08-07 06:46:32 Re: failing to build preproc.c on solaris with sun studio