| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest" |
| Date: | 2022-08-03 18:41:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20220803184149.b7c4sglhofs3s7ab@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-08-03 10:52:36 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> The situation I'm looking at, though, is where we have a dozen patches
> floating forward that multiple CFMs in a row feel should be returned,
> but they won't because claiming "they have feedback" is clearly unfair
> to the author. I think this will improve that situation.
What patches are we concretely talking about?
My impression is that a lot of the patches floating from CF to CF have gotten
sceptical feedback and at best a minor amount of work to address that has been
done.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-08-03 18:48:57 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-08-03 18:26:43 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |