Re: Use "WAL segment" instead of "log segment" consistently in user-facing messages

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Use "WAL segment" instead of "log segment" consistently in user-facing messages
Date: 2022-07-20 01:25:26
Message-ID: 20220720.102526.1381620267648963520.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:58:28 -0700, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 02:43:59PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > Done. PSA v5 patch set.
>
> LGTM. I've marked this as ready-for-committer.

I find the following sentense in config.sgml. "Specifies the minimum
size of past log file segments kept in the pg_wal directory"

postgresql.conf.sample contains "logfile segment" in a few lines.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-07-20 01:30:08 Re: errdetail/errhint style
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-07-20 00:58:08 Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns