Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com
Cc: pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, jakub(dot)wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation
Date: 2022-07-19 04:33:33
Message-ID: 20220719.133333.1514732348347630523.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(Mmm. I haven't noticed an annoying misspelling in the subejct X( )

> Thank you for checking that! It got a wider attack by b0a55e4329
> (RelFileNumber). The commit message suggests "relfilenode" as files

Then, now I stepped on my own foot. Rebased also on nodefuncs
autogeneration.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
v23-0001-In-place-table-persistence-change.patch text/x-patch 78.4 KB
v23-0002-New-command-ALTER-TABLE-ALL-IN-TABLESPACE-SET.patch text/x-patch 17.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-07-19 04:47:15 Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-07-19 04:30:24 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum