| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: automatically generating node support functions |
| Date: | 2022-07-11 22:41:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20220711224130.tg6bcnslgyfijuiw@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-07-11 18:39:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I'm not entirely sure how well either the existing or the sketch above works
> > when doing a VPATH build using tarball sources, and updating the files.
>
> Seems like an awful lot of effort to avoid having multiple copies
> of the file list. I think we should just do what I sketched earlier,
> ie put the master list into gen_node_support.pl and have it cross-check
> that against its command line. If the meson system can avoid having
> its own copy of the list, great; but I don't feel like we have to make
> that happen for the makefiles or Solution.pm.
WFM.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-11 23:01:33 | Re: Making CallContext and InlineCodeBlock less special-case-y |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-11 22:39:44 | Re: automatically generating node support functions |