Re: pg_checkpointer is not a verb or verb phrase

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_checkpointer is not a verb or verb phrase
Date: 2022-07-05 19:42:13
Message-ID: 20220705194213.GA1317473@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 01:38:43PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hearing several votes in favor and none opposed, committed and
> back-patched to v15.

Thanks.

> I added the catversion bump, but left out the .po
> file changes, figuring it was better to let those files get updated
> via the normal process.

I'll keep this in mind for future patches. The changes looked pretty
obvious, so I wasn't sure whether to include it.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-07-05 19:46:57 Re: doc: BRIN indexes and autosummarize
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-07-05 19:41:00 Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: pg_upgrade can result in early wraparound on databases with high transaction load