Re: Add test of pg_prewarm extenion

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Dong Wook Lee <sh95119(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add test of pg_prewarm extenion
Date: 2022-06-30 02:24:37
Message-ID: 20220630022437.GS28130@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 02:38:12PM +0900, Dong Wook Lee wrote:
> Hi hackers,
> I wrote a test for pg_prewarm extension. and I wrote it with the aim of improving test coverage, and feedback is always welcome.

The test fails when USE_PREFETCH isn't defined.
http://cfbot.cputube.org/dongwook-lee.html

You can accommodate that by adding an "alternate" output file, named like
pg_prewarm_0.out

BTW, you can test your patches the same as cfbot does (before mailing the list)
on 4 OSes by pushing a branch to a github account. See ./src/tools/ci/README

--
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-06-30 02:42:25 Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-06-30 01:59:52 Re: Inconvenience of pg_read_binary_file()