Re: Retrieving unused tuple attributes in ExecScan

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: "Ma, Marcus" <marcjma(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Retrieving unused tuple attributes in ExecScan
Date: 2022-06-27 19:09:46
Message-ID: 20220627190946.6b7xekyibfvkzvkn@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-06-27 19:00:44 +0000, Ma, Marcus wrote:
> If I understand correctly, when a Sequential Scan takes place, the ExecScan function (located in executor/execScan.c) does not retrieve all attributes per tuple in the TupleTableSlot and only retrieves the necessary attribute. So for example, let’s imagine we have a table t1 with 3 number fields, c1, c2, and c3. So in the command:
>
> Select * from t1 where t1.c1 > 500;
>
> The returned TupleTableSlot will have its field of tts_values in the form (X, 0, 0), where X is the real value of t1.c1 but the fields of c2 and c3 are not actually retrieved because they aren’t used. Similarly, for the command:
>
> Select * from t1;
>
> The TupleTableSlot will always return the values of (0, 0, 0) because no
> comparisons are necessary. I am working on code where I’ll need access to
> attributes that aren’t listed in any qualification – what code should I
> change in execScan, or nodeSeqScan to be able to retrieve any attribute of a
> tuple? Basically, being able to make execScan return (X, Y, Z) instead of
> (0, 0, 0) even if the command doesn’t use any attribute comparisons.

You'll need to tell the planner that those columns are needed. It's not just
seqscans that otherwise will discard / not compute values.

Where exactly do you need those columns and why?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ma, Marcus 2022-06-27 19:29:34 Re: Retrieving unused tuple attributes in ExecScan
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2022-06-27 19:05:57 Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests