| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Петър Славов <pet(dot)slavov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2022-05-30 20:51:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20220530205125.uyxvvolr4xfdykwt@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2022-05-30 22:40:39 +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2022-May-30, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > On 2022-05-30 15:54:08 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > Yeah, I agree that we'd better revert c98763bf for the time being.
> > > And f9900df on top of that?
> >
> > Well, f9900df needs to be reverted, because it caused the problem at hand, and
> > is ontop of c98763bf...
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here. I understood that
> both RIC and CIC are affected, so the reversal is of the following
> commits:
I was just a bit confused about Michael's phrasing of reverting f9900df "on
top of" c98763bf. Not important...
> c98763bf51bf Avoid spurious waits in concurrent indexing
> f9900df5f949 Avoid spurious wait in concurrent reindex
> d9d076222f5b VACUUM: ignore indexing operations with CONCURRENTLY
That looks right, yes.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-05-31 01:45:04 | Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-05-30 20:43:41 | Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY |