Re: Improving connection scalability (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving connection scalability (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Date: 2022-05-29 18:21:44
Message-ID: 20220529182144.w2qac7rpe223wies@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-05-29 18:00:14 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Also, there's the question of correctness, and I'd bet Andres is right
> getting snapshot without holding ProcArrayLock is busted.

Unless there's some actual analysis of this by Rainier, I'm just going to
ignore this thread going forward. It's pointless to invest time when
everything we say is just ignored.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2022-05-29 20:02:32 Re: Improving connection scalability (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2022-05-29 17:26:44 Re: Improving connection scalability (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)