Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date: 2022-05-21 01:28:01
Message-ID: 20220521012801.GA2934331@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 06:20:08PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Attached is an updated patch to address your concerns.

Looks successful.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-05-21 03:03:55 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-05-21 00:20:11 Re: allow building trusted languages without the untrusted versions