Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, 李杰(慎追) <adger(dot)lj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index
Date: 2022-04-26 05:28:15
Message-ID: 202204260528.yfc7jqc64eas@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-Apr-26, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 08:58:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Well, I am a bit annoyed that we don't actually check that a CLUSTER
> > command does not block when doing a CLUSTER on a partitioned table
> > while a lock is held on one of its partitions. So, attached is a
> > proposal of patch to improve the test coverage in this area.
>
> This was the last reason why this was listed as an open item, so,
> hearing nothing, I have applied this patch to add those extra tests,
> and switched the item as fixed.

Thank you!

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-04-26 05:36:05 Re: pgsql: Add contrib/pg_walinspect.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-04-26 05:25:14 Re: pgsql: Add contrib/pg_walinspect.